🟢 1. “We want the same outcome, but not the same methods.”
Both sides want fewer dogs on the streets.
The difference is ethics vs. cruelty.
Culling only creates a vacuum that brings new, unvaccinated dogs.
ABC (sterilisation + vaccination) is the only legal, scientific, humane method that permanently reduces dog populations.
🟢 2. “If love alone could house every dog, the streets would be empty.”
Most animal lovers already adopt far beyond their means.
They spend their own money doing what is actually the government’s job.
Saying “take all dogs home” is as absurd as saying “take all homeless people home.”
Adoption is compassion. Policy is responsibility.
🟢 3. “‘Send dogs to shelters’ sounds nice… until you realise there are no shelters.”
India has no government-run dog shelters.
Existing ones are overcrowded NGO death traps: 500 dogs in space meant for 50.
Dogs die of disease, starvation, fights, and despair.
People shouting “send them to shelters” have never rescued even one animal.
ABC keeps dogs safe in their own territories — not in cages of misery.
🟢 4. “Yes, dogs bite — that’s why we want ABC.”
Aggression comes from hunger, fear, abuse, and lack of sterilisation.
Blaming dogs is like blaming fever for malaria.
Culling is like treating cancer with Crocin — useless.
India tried killing dogs for 100 years. Result: nothing but cruelty and more dogs.
The real failure is 20 years of poor ABC implementation.
🟢 5. “Sterilisation doesn’t work? The entire world disagrees.”
Bhutan, Netherlands, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Turkey — all show ABC works beautifully.
If ABC “fails” in India, it’s due to corruption: fake numbers, ghost surgeries, untouched areas.
Don’t blame biology; blame mismanagement.
When done honestly, ABC works everywhere.
🟢 6. “If only humans matter, soon nothing will matter — not even humans.”
“Humans first” ideology is what got us to environmental collapse.
Compassion isn’t weakness — it’s the only thing that keeps a species civilised.
Once you say one life doesn’t matter, you open the door for the same logic to erase you.
Protecting animals = protecting humanity’s soul.
🟢 7. “If the government truly cared about humans, it would follow science, not mobs.”
ABC protects humans: fewer dogs, fewer bites, zero rabies.
Culling satisfies mobs, not science.
A government serious about human safety would implement mass ABC like polio — not chase quick, cruel fixes.
Science saves lives. Hatred doesn’t.
🟢 8. “If some NGOs are corrupt, punish the NGOs — not the animals.”
Yes, some NGOs misuse funds.
That is a legal issue, not a dog issue.
Blaming dogs for corrupt NGOs is like blaming symptoms instead of disease.
Hold NGOs accountable — don’t punish innocent animals.
🟢 9. “Even if a pharma angle exists, real animal lovers want street dogs gone through ABC.”
In a corrupt country, anything is possible — even pharma lobbying.
But genuine animal lovers want the opposite: sterilised dogs, vaccinated dogs, no dogs on the streets.
ABC ends uncontrolled populations and ends the need for repeated vaccines.
Don’t blame dogs for pharma profits — blame the people profiting.
🟢 10. “Why is nobody questioning ABC centres, media lies, and 20 years of zero action?”
ABC centres are collapsing, understaffed, and unmonitored.
Media spreads fear, not facts.
In 20 years, India hasn’t done a single serious, coordinated ABC or rabies campaign — unlike polio, which we eradicated with political will.
If ABC had been done properly, this debate wouldn’t exist.
Don’t blame the victims — ask why the cure was never delivered.
🟢 11. “When even the highest court refuses to hear science, the last pillar of hope collapses.”
For years, animal lovers believed that if nothing else worked, science, law, and the Supreme Court would stand as the final shield of sanity.
But when the Court brushed aside expert data, global evidence, and decades of proven science behind ABC — it felt like the last pillar of hope cracked.
When a constitutional court stops listening to facts, research, and humane solutions, it sets a dangerous precedent: today it is the dogs who are unheard… tomorrow it will be someone else.
A democracy is only as strong as its compassion.
When the voiceless lose protection, everyone becomes vulnerable.
🟢 12. “A nation cannot preach compassion in its scriptures and cruelty in its policies.”
The same government that proudly invokes religion to win hearts and votes often forgets what those very teachings stand for: kindness to all beings, protection of animals, reverence for cows, respect for dogs, and compassion as a sacred duty.
Yet the lived reality is the opposite — a country that speaks of ahimsa while becoming one of the world’s largest exporters of cattle products, a country that chants compassion yet promotes cruelty as a “solution” to dog issues.
When a nation disconnects its moral voice from its political actions, it begins sliding into a dangerous hypocrisy: a place where compassion is used as a slogan, not a value.
A society that abandons its gentlest beings is not rising; it is declining — drifting away from its own cultural roots, ethical foundations, and spiritual promises.
If we truly believed in the values we claim, we would protect the vulnerable, not persecute them.
A country’s real trajectory is shown not by slogans, but by how it treats those who can’t fight back.
