I just read an article about “dog menace” in India. The article was riddled with one sided biased stories and images. Ridiculous to see how a paper like NY times allows such crap on their website. Not a single scientific data was given, nor the reasons why ABC is done. Just showed few pictures of bunch of strays baring their fangs and some stories of unknown people and children being bitten.
Please have some moral responsibility to be neutral while writing an article. Shame on you NY times.
Hiranmay Karlekar